WALLIS v. THE COMPANY OF PROPRIETORS OF THE BIRMINGHAM WATER WORKS. – The Appellant in this cause is Mr. Stephen Wallis who resides near Salford Bridge, about three miles north of Birmingham. The Respondents, the Company we have designated above. A special Jury having been impanneled to try this cause, early in the Sessions, they went down to take a view of the premises, and the trial was brought on before Sir Eardley on Thursday morning. The dispute between the parties originated in the following circumstances. Mr. Wallis is the proprietor of some land by the side of the river, near Salford Bridge, which the Company wished to purchase to erect works for the purpose of supplying the town of Birmingham with water. As the parties could not agree about the price of the ground, they availed themselves of a clause in the act of 7th George the 4th, and brought the case up to the Sessions, by way of appeal, for a Jury to fix the sum which the Appellant should have as a compensation for his land. The time of the Court was occupied a considerable time in objections and replication of the respective Counsel, when the Court strongly recommended a reference. This was finally agreed to, and Henry Jacob, William Jellicoe, and Richard Fowler, jun. were appointed Referees, to say what compensation should be given to Mr. Wallis, by the Company, for his land. A verdict was then taken for the Appellant, of £12,000, subject to the award of the Arbitrators.
(Warwick and Warwickshire Advertiser, 16th January 1830)