LORD LIEUTENANT’S SECRETARY,
Objected to by the Unionists.
AT BELLEEK REVISION SESSIONS.
Belleek Revision Sessions were opened on Friday by his Honour County Court Judge Johnston, K.C., Revising Barrister.
Mr. J. W. Hanrahan, Clerk of the Crown and Peace, acted as registrar.
The Nationalists were represented by Mr. W. P. Maguire, solicitor, Enniskillen, instructed by Messrs. John Keenan (Enniskillen), D. Gilfodder, R.D.C., John Maguire, Thomas M’Grath, Patrick Scott, J.P., John Keon, and John Magorty.
The Unionists were represented by Mr. Chas. F. Falls, solicitor, Enniskillen, assisted by Jas. H. Charlton [James Hamilton Charlton], Hugh Wallace [Hugh Wallace (1845-1922), who was also father-in-law of Charlton], Johnston M’Brien, John O’Neill, and others.
Mr. J. B. Chism, Clerk of the Ballyahannon Union, and Rate Collectors M’Dermott and May were in attendance.
James Cecil Johnston (Private Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant) was objected to by the Unionists on the grounds that he had sub-let Magheramena Castle. He was described on the register as “a rated occupier – £80 – Magheramena.”
It appeared that the rating of the Castle was £80, but that he is in possession of lands in Magheramena rated for over £100.
It was admitted he had sub-let the Castle, but Mr. Maguire, solicitor, contended that the amount of his rating in the Register – £80 – was an error, and that he should have been rated for the total amount appearing in the rate book, and that therefore the revising barrister had power to amend by altering the £80 to the amount of the total rating, and that he would then have more than a sufficient rating to entitle him to the franchise. He also relied on the point that the description of the qualifying premises in the register was Magheramena, and not Magheramena Castle, and there was no evidence to show that he was on the register merely in respect of Magheramena Castle.
Mr. Falls argued that it was for Magheramena Castle Mr. Johnston was registered, because there was only one £80 rating in the rate books, and that was the actual rating of the Castle, and that therefore the revising barrister could not amend the rating as that would be introducing new qualifying premises.
The Revising Barrister struck out the name but said he would allow Mr. Maguire to reopen the case if he could produce any decision in favour of his contention.
(Fermanagh Herald, 21st September 1912)